Dis-appointment
Listen to this article
I do quite a bit of travel and I've always wished that travel agents would send my itinerary as an electronic invitation but they never do. In fact none of my customers do either. Actually, come to think of it, pretty much no one does. So why don't more people use ICalendar and VCalendar when sending out meeting or appointment invitations?
At one point in my career I was forced - against my will - to use Lotus Notes and yet one thing we all did was send each other meeting invitations. However, rarely if ever have I seen them sent outside of an organisation. This seems rather strange to me as almost every email application I can think of supports one or other of the formats: Mac Mail; Outlook; Thunderbird; Eudora; Evolution; even Lotus Notes!
For example, Mail+iCal on my powerbook allow me to send and recieve invitations. My calendar is automatically updated when an invitation arrives and updates are automatically sent out when I change one that I've initiated.
Have I missed something or is there some reason I have to manually create and update all my appointments?
Comments
I agree. Even if there are conflicting formats, surely enterprising mail clients could sniff out an invitation, and bung it in your calendar.
Who knows, OS-X mail might already do this. I have a nice new mac, but I never use it - my wife will NOT let me pry it out of her hands, EVER ! Since I got wifi at home, she in inseperable from the ibook. I foolishly thought I could both buy her a new laptop, and also get my hands dirty in mac software... alas it didn't work out that way.
Anyway, - what good windows clients are there for VCalendar et al?
Posted by: Michael | May 28, 2005 09:40 PM
I guess it depends on your definition of "good" but as I said, I'm almost certain that Outlook, Thunderbird, Eudora and even Lotus Notes do.
Posted by: Simon Harris | May 28, 2005 09:46 PM
Could well be that a lot of companies have put some rules in place not to use that feature for outside communications. At least MS Exchange can be configured to suppress this kind of informationen when sending to an external recipient. To me it looks like this should be revised.
Posted by: Stephan Schwab | May 30, 2005 06:24 AM